View Full Version : Loose Change is a joke.
eOs
9th July 2008, 04:35 AM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8182697765360042032&hl=en
If you want real evidence watch this architect prove that explosives were used on 9/11, and stfu.
M_Rommel
9th July 2008, 07:50 AM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8182697765360042032&hl=en
If you want real evidence watch this architect prove that explosives were used on 9/11, and stfu.
Assuming that explosives were used in the WTC attacks, what evidence do you have regarding the persons who planted them?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5370762387415552903&hl=en
I've seen a lot of videos about 9-11, and I just can't wrap my head around the concept that Bush would orchestrate something like this and be able to pull it off. It's really a long shot that an administration that can't seem to do anything right could pull off something as flawless as this, don't you think?
In any case, I'm not really looking to stir up trouble or a big debate. These are just my thoughts on the matter. Thanks for the link, and I'll watch it tomorrow; g2g get some sleep right now, but I'll check it out real soon.
M_Rommel
9th July 2008, 08:04 AM
Shoot, forgot to give a setup for the link I provided. That's just a video of 9-11, what happened...actually, screw that vid, here's a better one. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=65460757734339444&hl=en
Have to say that I'm as skeptical as anyone about the secretive goings on of the government. Never could understand how anyone could let the government get away with hiding information under the retarded guise of "national security." Seems like national security should apply to me, a US national, right? But anyway, I'm uncertain if a new investigation into 9-11 would even do any real good (especially if it was pushed through under this administration). The Kennedy assassination got a subsequent investigation, and it only upheld, essentially, the findings of the first investigation.
The moral of this story? In my opinion, it might just be that 9-11 happened, basically, as it was construed by the media. 19 Islamic fundamentalists under the thumb of bin Laden did it, and the subsequent celebrations in much of the Middle East confirmed just how fucked up the 'religion of peace' could become under the prodding of fanatical Imams. Even if the 9-11 Truth movement could get another investigation, there's a variety of problems: one, the evidence probably isn't worth much anymore. Two, who's to say the conclusions wouldn't just come back to be the same thing? Three, if this were the case (that 9-11 was found, again, to be caused by 19 terrorists, not the US government), who's to say that the 9-11 Truth movement, undeterred, wouldn't just push for yet another investigation?
raiden654
29th July 2008, 02:21 AM
the woman in the hole in the wall of the tower could have been sum deranged pranksert photoshopping it but i highly boubt its fake i been researching these things for a long time now and alot of things seem to tie in like they have all been a chain of events ment to bring on a new age of some sort.somehow this reminds me of when V(from v for vendetta) knocked over a large amount of dominoes while the cop spoke of a chain of events.maybe i just watch 2 many movies.only time will tell.
Pimpin4Life30
1st August 2008, 04:30 AM
I too believe that there were bombs planted Heres another video 9/11 Conspiracy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7cvjBViV7g&feature=related)
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.